Should we be worried about the ‘new’ Van Halen record, “A Different Kind of Truth”? I’m speaking mostly to the VH fans, here, I realise, but normal, non-Eddie, Alex, Dave and Wolfgang obsessives can join in, too – just click on the link above and listen to “Tattoo”. Join us back here when you’re done.
A band reforming is one issue – Will they still be any good? Will they all get along? A band reforming and then taking a bunch of old songs, fragments and demo tunes and reworking them into their new album is quite another and that’s what the advanced scuttlebutt is telling us about “A Different Kind of Truth” – that many of the songs actually date back to Van Halen’s inception during the 1970’s.
I’m all for artists being prolific, but I’m not sure that being prolific is the same as raiding the off-cuts, never-were and ideas that you were never quite able to whip into shape. Is that really any way to announce that you’re back – by releasing a record largely composed of stuff that your hardcore fan base will be aware of via the tape-trading circuit from back in the day?
I suppose I should just be happy that Van Halen are back again, but I’m holding my judgement until I hear the record. On that note, Blabbermouth have posted the latest snippet from “A Different Kind of Truth” – a song called “Chinatown”, which dates from back in the day but is a little more convincing than “Tattoo” was. The comments section has it pegged as being melodically in the same territory as VH classic rocker “Hang ‘Em High”, which seems like a fair enough assessment.
It’s only fair to warn you that the vintage 1982 video linked to above contains leopard-print dungarees. Viewer discretion is advised…