It’s a Thursday, there’s precious little on TV – why not take in the latest trailer for “Star Trek Into Darkness”?
This would be the “Empire Strikes Back” of the reborn “Star Trek” movie franchise, then? I’m guessing so, what with the doomy tone, Benedict Cumberbatch‘s messianic sociopath running amok and blowing up half of the planet and the gloriously blatant shuttle craft/Millennium Falcon riff showing up in this two minutes and 15 seconds of face-melting, nerd glee.
Oh, and if you’re into that kind of thing, Alice Eve‘s character apparently can’t afford clothes. Hollywood double standards, how do they work?
Have a new poster for the movie whilst you work that one out…
“Star Trek Into Darkness” – none more dark, squire…
Filed under Films, Geekery
In the UK, we might suffer through hilariously terrible weather for most of the year, must bear at least some responsibility for unleashing Simon Cowell, One Direction & Robert Pattinson on an unsuspecting globe and can’t keep a shop open to save our lives, but know this, global peeps –
We’re getting “Star Trek Into Darkness” a week early!
Ignore that date on the poster above – the second “Trek” adventure from J.J. Abrams is now out in the UK on 9th May 2013 – which is going to come as scant consolation to all the people in the Den of Geek comments section, linked above, who have booked days off work and holidays on the basis of it coming out a week or so later. Nerds, eh – gotta love ’em…
Filed under Films, Geekery
Oh hai there, “Into Darkness” bad person, Benedict Cumberbatch! Trailer images (C) Paramount Pictures/Bad Robot
If you haven’t spent your day constantly re-watching the “Into Darkness” teaser trailer on your PC at work, there’s a good chance that you A) Don’t have to use a PC for your work or B) Are Fluffrick and are sadly compelled to rock an office PC so antediluvian that it might as well be considered a Steampunk artefact.
If, like this blogger, you had to wait until home time to catch the new J.J. Abrams‘ “Star Trek“ movie’s teaser trailer, no doubt you’re trying to form words and phrases which can fully encompass the splendiferousness with which your gentle eyeballs have been subject to.
From the look on Chris Pine and Zoe Saldana’s faces, Cumberbatch isn’t playing “Twister”. Unless it’s Deadly 23rd Century Death-Trap Twister, of course.
The best that I can come up with is a onamatapeaic noise which sounds like a small child gargling jelly compulsively. All teaser trailers are meant to pimp the biggest, boldest moments of any blockbuster, but this first look is impressive as much for lead bad guy Benedict Cumberbatch’s superbly gravelly, unrelenting grim voice-over which offers a tantalising suggestion that the shiny-happy territory of the rebooted 2009 film is being jettisoned in favour of “Wrath of Khan“-style, “I can’t believe they did that!“ character offing and high stakes scares. In fact, if you’ve watched the slightly longer, Japanese teaser trailer for the film, the “Wrath of Khan” comparison seems more than justified…
Fringe versus Fringe – who will triumph?
Go and press your face against the screen HERE if you haven’t seen the trailer. And then watch it 25 times. You know you want to…
As we wait for either the nine-minute IMAX prologue playing before selected screenings of “The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey“, the astute folk at Paramount have elected to steal a march on the marketing for next summer’s “Star Trek” sequel by releasing every geek-centric blockbuster’s must-have item, the enigmatic teaser poster.
Putting on my modish great-coat and a fashionably directional long scarf in the manner of all the best consulting detectives, I note that the poster seems to feature putative “Star Trek Into Darkness” villain, Benedict Cumberbatch, who is of course playing classic “Trek” baddie Gary Mitchell/
Khan/Keyser Soze (delete as likely) in the J.J. Abrams directed sequel.
And that scene of urban mass destruction, the hallmark of all contemporary bad guys who seek to threaten our very way of life via the medium of terrorist action – could it be London? As Empire magazine‘s post on the teaser poster intimated, the background scenery seems to have the ‘Gherkin’ building prominently featured.
England’s capital? Being destroyed in a summer blockbuster? Such a thing has never happened before…
A trailer for this must-see geek fest is due before the end of 2012 – I don’t know about you, but I already have my popcorn ready for that one…
Filed under Films, Geekery
If you’ve been blogging for a while and take a look at how people searching online reach your site, you will no doubt have more than your fair share of ‘They searched for THAT and found me?’ results in your blog’s dashboard area.
Hence this post, inspired by some optimistic fellow seeking “Rosamund Pike Wrath of the Titians”. Conjures an interesting picture doesn’t it? They were, of course, seeking Rosamund in this Spring’s sequel “Wrath of the Titans“, but they did at least have a fighting chance of reaching my blog or finding a lovely image of the charming Ms Pike in her most recent film role.
As interesting are the bonkers results – “Sandra Bullock in Judge Dredd” comes to mind. Clearly somebody conflating Sandy Bullock in the Stallone vehicle “Demolition Man“ with the not exactly dissimilar Diane Lane in the 1995 Stallone “Judge Dredd” and perhaps telling us a little more than Stallone might want to know about how unique and memorable some of his back catalogue is to the casual viewer?
Regularly top of my stats?
I get a 100 to 200 searches every week for the Fantastic Four, who I’ve only posted about once, in relation to the putative Josh Trank reboot of the franchise that Twentieth Century Fox are quite eager to get underway. I’m not running a web hub for the perpetually bickering, Doctor Doom-thwarting Marvel superheroes, I don’t post regularly about them, but who can refuse that level of traffic?
Or is it just lusty Jessica Alba fanboys skewing things? Who can say?
My favourite, utterly barking search result? This one.
I know, right? Somebody thought of that and ended up clicking through to me, I assume for my sterling coverage of Tom Hiddleston and Benedict Cumberbatch‘s careers. Or they’re just into tall dudes. Takes all kinds of folks, I guess…
These Otters Look Like Benedict Cumberbatch | Tor.com.
Admittedly, I am presently struggling with a cold and appropriately medicated, but I’m still forced to ask the question – is this, like, real life?
More at the link…
I know that folks can be a mite sensitive about spoilers when it comes to the next “Star Trek” film from curly-haired, black eyeglass-framed visionary J.J. Abrams.
Chances are that they don’t want to know about the nature of Benedict Cumberbatch’s role, whether Zachary Quinto is still an Emo bad ass or how many alien ladies Chris Pine is going to squire this time around.
So those guys are going to be as ticked off as Abrams was at the weekend when some sneaky pictures leaked from the set of the second “Star Trek” film – I’m going to link to them but I’ll spare your spoiler-radar from going haywire by including the most innocuous one.
But what does it all mean? She's leaning, there's some pieces of set there - such an enigma!
Yep, it’s the one of Zoe Saldana’s Uhura getting to wield a phaser, in the daylight, on some kind of space craft. If you want to see Messrs Cumberbatch and Quinto having words, click-through to Den of Geek’s story.
Needless to say, the second Abrams “Trek” movie is one of my most eagerly anticipated films of 2013 and any degree of rampant spoilers won’t stop me from going to see this film on opening weekend. Probably in the company of Mrs Rolling Eyeballs and our good friend, Eva’s Mum – who wasn’t a “Trek” fan before seeing the film but certainly was afterwards (she’s a big Abrams /“Lost” and “Alias” fan).
Mr Watson and friend solve problems via the medium of genius...
So, this is what it’s like to be popular.
You write one post on “Sherlock” season 2’s finale (and season 3’s green-light) and it goes – as they say – viral.
I thought that something was going on when I looked at my WordPress site statistics and noticed a bit more traffic than I usually get in the middle of the week. This happens from time to time, but the visits that I was getting were skewing ever higher.
My fatalist brain suspected hacking or spam-bot infiltration of some kind but the truth was rather more benevolent – the BBC’s “Sherlock” mini-site had automatically selected my post and put it up in their blog buzz section, which caused views to go utterly hat stand for the best part of a day.
Fame! Sweet, small-time, nerd-o-riffic Internet Fame!
Things are now getting back to normal and the view count has chilled a bit – which is probably how I like it. Imagine the pressure of having to entertain people day in, day out and not having the first clue about how you’re going to go about it! It doesn’t bear thinking about…
Oh, that sneaky Steven Moffat.
After THAT ending to season two of “Sherlock” – which, if you haven’t seen it, I wouldn’t dream of spoiling – Steven Moffat put on his best showman’s hat and confirmed that there will be a third season of the BBC Arthur Conan Doyle update. All that we have to do now is get two parts of “The Hobbit”, the next series of “Doctor Who” and “Star Trek 2” out-of-the-way and all concerned in front of (and behind) the camera can give the further adventures of Holmes and Watson their fullest attentions.
I think that this is a show which benefits from being revisited, so I don’t think that I can really properly review the last episode without seeing it again – so many twists, reversals, clever bits and devilish misdirection make it the kind of programme that you have to see again with the knowledge that you carry forward from an initial viewing.
It was tremendously exciting TV from the outset, with killer acting from Cumberbatch, who’s entirely prepared to be true to Holmes’ character and make him an insufferable ass, cruel to those to care for him but never so devoid of humanity that he becomes absolutely unsympathetic. In an age where reality TV wants to smooth out imperfections and make our heroes and heroines ciphers who don’t offer complex contradictions or, well, recognizable human quirks lest they not be immediately telegraphed for instant understanding, this iteration of Holmes is incredibly refreshing and compulsively watchable.
Fantastic, too, was Martin Freeman as Watson – he shows us that he cares deeply for Holmes (which his brilliant friend appears to misinterpret as caring more about the public perception of the duo – public image and the way in which it is manipulated by the tabloid press was a theme running throughout the storyline) but does this with tremendous subtlety and grace. He’s a far more accomplished dramatic actor than I gave him credit for, having really only seen him in “The Hitchhiker’s Guide To The Galaxy” film adaptation before he appeared in this film.
We only get three episodes of “Sherlock” every eighteen months or so, but when they are this consistently good it feels quite churlish to complain about perceived brevity – if the alternative is a generous abundance of mediocrity, I’ll take being (relatively) short-changed by the number of episodes in a series any day of the week.
That J. J. Abrams – he’s got an eye for talent.
Not content with casting Simon Pegg in the first film, the Bad Robot uber-geek has set my heart a flutter by casting Benedict Cumberbatch and Noel Clarke in the upcoming second instalment of the rebooted classic sci-fi franchise.
N.C. - Like a boss...
He's a dish, isn't he?
Early rumours/demented fan squeeing suggests Cumberbatch will be very definitely alien, with “Trek” having a strong tradition of casting Brits as Klingons.
As for renaissance dude Clarke, he’s playing a family man. Thanks for that nugget, Paramount folks – really gives us bloggists something to write about.
Production starts next week for a summer 2013 release. In related news, I will be slowly vibrating with excitement and nerdy anticipation from roughly the same time.
Filed under Films, Geekery